The governors promised the United States to fund it. The promise was that people`s wealth and energy would support the government and guarantee the debt. But there was a small problem. Natural living people cannot mix with legal fictions (corporate), so it was necessary to create a bridge between fictions and people in order to subjugate people and subordinate them to government society. A fiction in court or a legal fiction is an artificially created entity that is considered only in law. In other words, it is not real, except in the eyes of the law written by men. The straw man theory dates back to the ancient Roman legal practice of capitis deminutio (“lowering of the head”), a term used in Roman trials to erase a person`s former legal capacity. Capitis deminutio minima meant that a person ceased to belong to a particular family without losing his freedom or citizenship. Capitis deminutio media implied the loss of citizenship and family, but not freedom. Capitis deminutio maxima involved the loss of family, citizenship, and freedom (i.e.

a slave or prisoner of war). [5] The straw man theory usually takes the term capitis deminutio, the spell “capitis diminutio” and claims that capitis diminutio maxima was represented by a person`s name in capital letters. This led to the idea that individuals had their own legal personality, which is now called the “straw man.” [6] There are also a number of court cases in the United States in which defendants have attempted to use the straw man theory as a defence, although this has never been recognized in U.S. law. In fact, the theory is officially recognized as fraud in U.S. law. Strohmann is a third party that holds assets in the meantime in order to transfer them to another. In real estate law, a straw man would be the person to whom a grantor transfers land for whatever reason; (sometimes called “front”) for the sole purpose of hiding the true owner. Any transaction where one party represents another party in a purchase where ownership is transferred is a straw man transaction. In order to create a suitable common tenancy in which a roommate was already involved, in the past it was first necessary to transfer the property to a straw man and then transfer the interest in the property to the final beneficiaries as roommates. A straw man business was necessary because the beneficiaries had to acquire their interests at the same time in order to form a unit of time and have the unit of ownership (same type of transfer); These two elements form a colocation. Legal fictions are the opposite of natural entities such as humans.

A created legal fiction is endowed by law to have certain privileges similar to the rights people have, such as the right to own property and to sue and be sued. The main application of the straw man theory is to escape and deny debts, responsibilities and legal responsibility. Tax protesters, “trade repayment” and “debt outflow” scams claim that debt and taxes are the responsibility of the straw man and not the real person. They support this assertion by misinterpreting the legal definition of a person[8] and misinterpreting the distinction between a legal person[9] and a natural person. [10] In accepted legal theory, there is a difference between what is called a natural person and that of a legal person. A corporate personality applies to businesses, charities, governments and other recognized organizations. The courts recognize people as “persons,” not as a legal fiction associated with a person of flesh and blood, but as one and the same person. [11] They never recognized the right to distance oneself from one`s person or the possibility of withdrawing from one`s personality.

[12] This idea has developed throughout history and has further reinforced the idea of a separate legal identity – now known as the straw man. It is impossible to circumvent the law by insisting that an individual is different from himself. If a court can establish a person`s identity regardless of his or her consent or cooperation, it prosecutes and sanctions the person. This is due to the legal principle Idem sonans (Latin for “to sound the same”), which states that similar-sounding names are equally valid when referring to a person. [16] The earliest precedent is R. v. Davis in the United Kingdom in 1851. [17] Straw man theorists, also known as free men, use birth certificates to explain the theory of 2 different identities.